top
geopoliticsnorth_logo


Arctic strategy documents - Canada and the Arctic PDF Print E-mail
Article Index
Arctic strategy documents
Finland's new Arctic strategy
Russian Arctic strategy
US Arctic region policy
Canada and the Arctic
The European Union and the Arctic region
Danish preliminary Arctic strategy
Norwegian High North strategy
All Pages

 

 

A short account of Canadian Arctic policies
The Canadian House of Commons passed in 2009 a bid to rename the North West Passage the Canadian North West Passage. The renaming of the passage can be attributed to the ongoing conflict between Canada and other countries, most notably the US, over the status of the passage. Canada considers it "internal waters", whereas the US and others consider it as an "international strait". The renaming can also be attributed to increased Canadian and international focus on the Arctic.

 

Two Canadian participants in the Geopolitics in the High North programme have presented somewhat different recommendations on how Canada should adapt to the potential of increase activity in the Arctic. 

 

Dr Rob Huebert argues in "Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security in a Transforming Circumpolar World" that Canada needs to adapt to a changing Arctic by increasing surveillance and enforcement capabilities. Furthermore, he proposes and develop an Arctic framework with especially the US and Russia to establish "rules of engagement" in the Arctic.

 

Prof. Franklyn Griffiths takes a more inclusive approach in his paper "Towards a Canadian Arctic Strategy" as he argues that cooperative stewardship is the key to securing Canadian Arctic interests. This can be achieved by strengthening the Arctic Council and including non members as consultative partners in the decision making process of the Council.

 

The Canadian government is in the process of developing an International Dimension of Canada's Northern Strategy. The main objective is to affirm by domestic action international recognition of the country's presence and positions in the Canadian Arctic. Key elements are:

  • Protection of Canada's environmental heritage
  • Promotion of economic and social development
  • Exercise of national sovereignty
  • Improvement and devolvement of governance to the Canadian Arctic

Canada is maintaining its military presence by holding military exercises in its Arctic territories, most notably the Operation Nanook held in August 2009. The exercise was regarded as a display of national sovereignty. Canada is engaged in managed disputes or disagreements with Denmark and the US. Furthermore, a disagreement with Russia could arise in the future over the underwater Lomonosov Ridge crossing the North Pole.

 

It is, however, unlikely that any of these will escalate into conflicts. In the Ilulissat Declaration the Arctic littoral states, including Canada, USA and Russia, declared that disputes is to be resolved peacefully through international bodies such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Canada, among other littoral states, is in the process of extending its continental shelf through the UNCLOS' regime.

 

Link to International Dimension of Canada's Northern Strategy 

August 2010: Link to new statement on Canada's Arctic foreign policy

 

 

 



 

bottom
© 2010 Geopolitics in the High North. All rights reserved

 
Norwegian Institute for defence Studies CSIS Fritjof Nansen Institute Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik University of Tromsø Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the MFA of Russia University of Oslo Institute of general history Norwegian Defence Research Establishment Econ Pöyry
 
  Contact us: Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies / www.ifs.mil.no
  Programme coordinator: Helene Forsland Widerberg / Telephone: +47 23 09 77 10
  Design: ReBirth Media

bottom